http://www.oasisadvancedwellness.com/health-articles/2009/11/medical-radiation-are-you-getting-too-much.html Natural health and wellness information and commentary by Loretta Lanphier, NP, CN, HHP, CH Tue, 06 Mar 2012 23:22:45 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://www.oasisadvancedwellness.com/health-articles/2009/11/medical-radiation-are-you-getting-too-much.html/comment-page-1#comment-6524 Terrene O'Neill Mon, 26 Jul 2010 13:10:57 +0000 http://www.oasisadvancedwellness.com/health-articles/?p=510#comment-6524 After my wife had successful lumpectomy surgery adn her doctor said 'we got it all', a radiologist down the hall called at least five times, and had my wife drive in to st. louis for consultation, claiming that my wife's doctor suggested it. She first said my wife could get in on an Washington university 'study' if she acted within two days... andthis alarmed me and my wife and I discussed it. Then this 'special deal' which would have included ten (10) doses of hard x-rays in the area just pronounced clear of cancer... was offered anytime, and reduced to just three (3) doses in the same area... the inference being that this would destroy any missed cancer. It appears to have been a scam, a way to give x-rays for more compensation, in an area where there was no cancer. I finally managed to talk my wife out of getting these useless adn damaging x-rays, but she (and many women) is non-rechnical, and relioes on and trusts doctors. I fear them. Also, the 'cancer' that was surgically removed was identified as "zero activity'... so, was it really cancer? The doctors never asked my wife about previous x-rays (damage from whih is accumulative), nor did they tell her x-rays were a government-classified Class A carcinogen. The terror and anxiety these doctors impose on my wife... and obviously on countless other women... needs to be stopped and punished. Is there a class action anywhere against these equipment manufacturere, supporting pharmacological companies, and the AMA that we could support? After my wife had successful lumpectomy surgery adn her doctor said ‘we got it all’, a radiologist down the hall called at least five times, and had my wife drive in to st. louis for consultation, claiming that my wife’s doctor suggested it. She first said my wife could get in on an Washington university ‘study’ if she acted within two days… andthis alarmed me and my wife and I discussed it. Then this ‘special deal’ which would have included ten (10) doses of hard x-rays in the area just pronounced clear of cancer… was offered anytime, and reduced to just three (3) doses in the same area… the inference being that this would destroy any missed cancer. It appears to have been a scam, a way to give x-rays for more compensation, in an area where there was no cancer. I finally managed to talk my wife out of getting these useless adn damaging x-rays, but she (and many women) is non-rechnical, and relioes on and trusts doctors.
I fear them.
Also, the ‘cancer’ that was surgically removed was identified as “zero activity’… so, was it really cancer?
The doctors never asked my wife about previous x-rays (damage from whih is accumulative), nor did they tell her x-rays were a government-classified Class A carcinogen.
The terror and anxiety these doctors impose on my wife… and obviously on countless other women… needs to be stopped and punished.
Is there a class action anywhere against these equipment manufacturere, supporting pharmacological companies, and the AMA that we could support?

]]> http://www.oasisadvancedwellness.com/health-articles/2009/11/medical-radiation-are-you-getting-too-much.html/comment-page-1#comment-570 Suzanne Somers: Exposing Secrets of a 200 Billion Dollar Cancer Industry | Oasis Health & Wellness Blog Tue, 01 Dec 2009 18:56:36 +0000 http://www.oasisadvancedwellness.com/health-articles/?p=510#comment-570 [...] Mammograms were designed to protect women by early detection of breast cancer; in actuality they increase the risk due to radiation exposure, claims Dr. Russell Blaylock-Brain Surgeon / Neuroscientist. The U.S. Preventive Task Force is now stating that women should not have yearly mammograms until the age of 50, and then only every two years. If better alternatives exist, then why do mainstream media and big pharmaceutical companies persist in using inferior treatments which do more harm than good?  Disinformation is defined as: false information deliberately and often covertly spread in order to influence public opinion or obscure the truth. Do you think it’s possible in a degenerative, greedy and power hungry society, there may be incentive within a 200 billion dollar a year industry to disseminate biased information in order to further one’s agenda? [...] [...] Mammograms were designed to protect women by early detection of breast cancer; in actuality they increase the risk due to radiation exposure, claims Dr. Russell Blaylock-Brain Surgeon / Neuroscientist. The U.S. Preventive Task Force is now stating that women should not have yearly mammograms until the age of 50, and then only every two years. If better alternatives exist, then why do mainstream media and big pharmaceutical companies persist in using inferior treatments which do more harm than good?  Disinformation is defined as: false information deliberately and often covertly spread in order to influence public opinion or obscure the truth. Do you think it’s possible in a degenerative, greedy and power hungry society, there may be incentive within a 200 billion dollar a year industry to disseminate biased information in order to further one’s agenda? [...]

]]>