Oasis Advanced Wellness Natural Health Blog

Red Yeast Rice Better Than Statin Drugs for Cardiac Health

noreply@blogger.com (Dr. Lanphier) — Thu, 24 Jul 2008 14:48:00 +0000

Despite Big Pharma and the FDA's desire to outlaw red yeast rice (see post on this blog from July 18, 2008), evidence continues to mount that it is safer and more effective than synthetic statin drugs and their associated toxic side effects. In the study cited by the following article, a combination of red yeast rice, fish oil, and lifestyle changes out performed Zocor (a leading statin drug) at balancing cholesterol, lowering triglycerides, and helping participants to lose weight.

There's some valuable information in today's article, but keep in mind that it is written from a conventional medicine viewpoint. For example, the author recommends taking these natural supplements "carefully," and tries to create fear by reminding us that we need to consult with our physicians regarding their usage because they are not "risk-free." The irony of the fact that Zocor poses far greater risks is conveniently overlooked. It is much safer to find a reputable source of natural supplements that have been helping to prevent disease for thousands of years

Red yeast rice, fish oil fight high cholesterol
By Anne Harding
Thu Jul 17, 2:46 PM ET

A regimen of supplements and lifestyle coaching is just as effective as statin medication for reducing levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) or "bad" cholesterol, and more effective in helping people lose weight, new research shows.

People with high cholesterol who took red yeast rice and fish oil daily and received counseling on diet, exercise and relaxation techniques showed the same 40 percent drop in LDL cholesterol seen among people taking 40 milligrams of simvastatin daily, Dr. David J. Becker of the University of Pennsylvania Health System's Chestnut Hill Hospital and colleagues found. And they pared off an average of 10 pounds over 12 weeks, compared to less than a pound for patients taking the statin.

Becker has run a lifestyle program for people at risk of heart disease for 13 years. "People had a uniform desire to get off statins, and when they did their cholesterol was only going down maybe 5 percent at most," he told Reuters Health. The cardiologist decided to launch the current study after seeing many patients have success in lowering their cholesterol with red yeast rice and fish oil.

With a grant from the state of Pennsylvania, Becker and his team randomly assigned 74 patients to receive 40 milligrams of simvastatin (Zocor) daily along with printed information on lifestyle changes, or to three capsules of fish oil twice daily and 600 milligrams of red yeast rice daily along with the 12-week lifestyle program.

LDL cholesterol levels fell by 42.4 percent in the red yeast rice group and by 39.6 percent in the simvastatin group, not a statistically significant difference. Triglyceride levels didn't change in the statin group, but fell 29 percent in the red yeast rice group, probably because they were taking fish oil, according to Becker and his team.

People in the red yeast rice group lost an average of 4.7 kilograms (just over 10 pounds), compared to 0.3 kilograms (less than a pound) in the statin group.

Red yeast rice comes from fermenting red yeast with rice. Known as hong ku, the substance has been used as a medicine and food garnish in parts of Asia for centuries, Becker said. It contains a substance called monacolin-K that is nearly identical to the cholesterol-lowering drug lovastatin (Mevacor), as well as several other monacolins that may also have cholesterol-lowering properties.

People in the red yeast rice arm of the study were taking the equivalent of 10 to 15 mg of lovastatin, Becker said. "This lovastatin dosage is quite small, yet the effects we saw with the red yeast rice were akin to those one would generally see with a much higher dose of lovastatin."

"However, it is not risk-free, and it must be used carefully and in conjunction with your physician."

If more studies bear out the current findings, he added, the supplement/lifestyle intervention he and his colleagues tested could offer an alternative to people with high cholesterol who don't want to take statins, or who can't tolerate the drugs. However, he added, people who actually have heart disease should stick with statins, because they have been shown to reduce mortality.

Becker noted that a recent analysis by ConsumerLab found red yeast rice products varied sharply in their potency, and some were contaminated with a toxic byproduct called citrinin. "This paper is a call for better regulation of this supplement as well so that we know consistently what's in it," he said.

SOURCE: Mayo Clinic Proceedings, July 2008

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080717/hl_nm/high_cholesterol_dc_1

New Study Bolsters Evidence for Cell Phone Hazards

noreply@blogger.com (Dr. Lanphier) — Wed, 23 Jul 2008 11:05:00 +0000

Regardless of the propaganda pushed by the cell phone industry that claims there is no solid research that supports a connection between mobile phone usage and cancer, in truth there are many studies that raise red flags concerning this issue. It is clear that frequent users are subject to an increased risk for certain types of cancer. It appears that factors such as frequent rural use can increase these risks even further. The reason for this is thought to be that the electrical signals in isolated areas must by necessity be stronger, as they need to travel farther between towers. However, some studies have also indicated an increased risk in urban areas too, due to the larger amount of signals.

We really need more time for long-term studies to be completed before all the pertinent facts can be established. However, it is recommended that those who do use cell phones take some common-sense precautions such as using a hands-free device whenever possible or alternating sides of the face if the phone is held directly to your ear. It is also not advisable to keep your mobile phone in a pocket, as this may pose additional risks.

Frequent Mobile Phone Use Boosts Tumor Risk by 50 Percent
by David Gutierrez

(NaturalNews) Frequent users of cellular phones develop tumors of the parotid gland 50 percent more often than less frequent users, according to a new study published in the American Journal of Epidemiology.

Researchers at the Chaim Sheba Medical Center in Israel examined data that included 402 cases of benign and 58 cases of malignant tumors of the parotid gland, the largest of the salivary glands. They found that people who used mobile phones for more than 22 hours each month had a 50 percent higher risk of developing parotid gland tumors. This risk increased among users who always held the phone to the same ear, who did not use handheld devices and who lived in rural areas.

"Analysis restricted to regular users or to conditions that may yield higher levels of exposure (e.g., heavy use in rural areas) showed consistently elevated risks," the researchers wrote.

Tumors formed more frequently on the side of the head that patients most frequently held their phones to.

The study adds to emerging evidence that long-term cellular phone use increases the risk of cancers and tumors. Because many cancers do not appear for 10 years after initial exposure to a carcinogen, many of the early industry-sponsored studies finding mobile phones to be safe have been criticized for their lack of scope and failure to examine long-term use.

Two studies have found increased risk of a highly dangerous type of brain cancer known as glioma from long-term cell phone use. In an English study, people who used cell phones for more than 10 years were found to have a 20 percent higher risk of glioma, while a similar German study found the risk to be elevated by 100 percent.

A 2004 Swedish study found that frequent users of mobile phones had a higher risk of developing noncancerous brain tumors known as acoustic neuroma.

http://www.naturalnews.com/z023621.html

Want to Control Pain Naturally? Write About It

noreply@blogger.com (Dr. Lanphier) — Tue, 22 Jul 2008 10:55:00 +0000

A study published last month in a journal that addresses the management of pain and other symptoms in seriously ill patients, points to the therapeutic value of writing about one's feelings while battling cancer or other debilitating conditions. Sometimes called "narrative medicine," such writing has traditionally focused on increasing communication in the patient-doctor relationship. However, the study detailed in today's post led researchers to conclude that "emotional writing" also has value by helping individuals to get in better touch with what they are feeling during this crisis in their lives. In addition, the results indicated that such writing helped to ease pain as well.

Easing pain is critical in order for healing to take place. When one is in pain, depression often sets in as well as a hopeless mentality. When pain is alleviated, depression usually lifts and one is then able to help and support their body toward healing and health, especially when natural methods are being used.

It is always good news to hear about another natural, drug-free way of dealing with pain. The benefits of sharing innermost feelings while fighting illness strengthens evidence for the mind, body, and spirit connections that surely play a role in both disease and wellness. Developing a habit of being open and truthful instead of suppressing our feelings and emotions can also help to prevent disease from ever occurring in the first place, and we know that prevention is clearly the best form of treatment.

"Emotional" writing may help ease cancer pain
Fri Jul 18, 1:39 PM ET

Some cancer patients may find that putting their emotions down in writing helps improve their pain and general well-being, a study suggests.

Such writing, part of a concept called "narrative" medicine, has been seen as a way to aid communication between seriously ill patients and their doctors.

But the act of writing, itself, may also help patients better understand themselves and their needs, according to the study team, led by Dr. M. Soledad Cepeda of Tufts-New England Medical Center in Boston.

To look at the question, they randomly assigned 234 cancer patients to one of three groups: one that was asked to perform narrative writing; one that filled out a standard questionnaire about pain symptoms; and one that stayed with standard care only.

All of the study patients were suffering from at least moderate levels of pain from their disease. Those in the narrative-writing group were asked to spend 20 minutes per week, for three weeks, writing about the ways in which cancer was affecting their daily lives.

At the study's start and then once a week for eight weeks, patients in all three groups completed a standard questionnaire about their well-being and rated their pain levels.

In general, Cepeda's team found, patients in the writing group who were open about their emotions showed less pain and greater well-being over time than the rest of the study subjects.

Such effects were not seen in patients whose writing was relatively unemotional, the researchers report in the Journal of Pain & Symptom Management.

The findings suggest that the emotional release of writing, specifically, is what helps patients deal with their cancer pain, according to Cepeda's team. However, they add, it's also possible that the most seriously ill patients find it more difficult to write about their feelings.

More studies are needed, the researchers conclude, to see whether encouraging seriously ill patients to reveal their emotions in writing benefits their well-being. In addition, they say, studies should look at whether verbally telling one's "story" has positive effects.

SOURCE: Journal of Pain & Symptom Management, June 2008.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080718/hl_nm/cancer_pain_dc&printer=1;_ylt=Ap0M0B31JBEo1qScbIqP6zcR.3QA

Mainstream Medicine Takes a Closer Look at Prevention

noreply@blogger.com (Dr. Lanphier) — Mon, 21 Jul 2008 11:35:00 +0000

The following article is encouraging because it highlights several programs instituted by conventional medicine organizations that are focusing on the value of disease prevention. One of the silver linings in the cloud of currently tough economic times is that everyone -- including public health providers, insurance companies, and the government -- are looking for ways to save money on health care. If that's what it takes for them to consider prevention seriously, so be it.

There's been a lot of talk in this election year about health care reform. Here's an idea: What about allowing people to use a medical-type savings account for disease preventative measures such as exercise programs, nutritional supplements, and classes that educate them how to eat right, maintain proper weight, and pursue a lifestyle of wellness. It would be even better if health insurance companies would be forced or enticed into covering such measures. If preventative medicine could be undertaken on a large scale such as this, the reduction in disease would be much greater than the paltry 5% predicted in these particular studies, and people would begin to actually live better and longer, without the use of toxic drugs. Hmm, I wonder how Big Pharma would feel about this?

Disease Prevention Programs Worth the Investment
Within five years, $16 billion a year could be saved, report claims
Posted July 17, 2008

By Ed EdelsonHealthDay Reporter

THURSDAY, July 17 (HealthDay News) -- Community-based health programs aimed at diet, exercise, smoking prevention and other known risk factors for chronic diseases could cut health-care costs in the United States by $16 billion a year, a new report says.

"We worked with economists at the Urban Institute who looked at health-care costs associated with these chronic diseases," said Jeffrey Levi, executive director of the Washington-based Trust for America's Health, which issued the report. "They estimated a 5 percent reduction in these chronic diseases to derive these savings."

The estimate was based on a model developed at the Urban Institute and a review of studies on the cost and effectiveness of prevention programs by experts at the New York Academy of Medicine.

Spending $10 a year per person would save the United States more than $16 billion annually within five years, the economists said, for a return of $5.60 on every $1 invested. Their survey showed that effective prevention programs costing less than $10 per person could reduce rates of type 2 diabetes and high blood pressure by 5 percent within two years, reduce heart disease, kidney disease and stroke by 5 percent within five years, and reduce some forms of cancer, arthritis and lung disease by 2.5 percent in 10 to 20 years.

Who would pay for the prevention programs? Primarily the same agencies that promote prevention programs now, such as the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and other agencies, along with state and local health departments, according to Levi.

"But since private insurance companies and Medicare and Medicaid would benefit, the question is whether some of these resources should be tapped," Levi said.

Medicare would save more than $5 billion a year, Medicaid would save more than $1.9 billion and private health insurers would save more than $9 billion, the economists estimated.

Levi said the report is "a call to action for people to recognize the importance of investing in these kinds of prevention measures."

"The programs recommended by the Trust for America's Health is an absolutely complementary approach" to preventive measures recently proposed in a collaboration by the American Heart Association, the American Cancer Society and the American Diabetes Association, said Dr. Rose Marie Robertson, chief science officer of the heart association.

"In the paper we just published, we looked at the concept that if people in the United States have some risk factor for cardiovascular disease, cancer or diabetes, they should see a health provider and get guidance to reduce or eliminate the risk factor," Robertson said.

Both approaches concentrate on the same risk factors, such as high blood pressure, smoking and lack of physical activity, but one proposes community programs, and the other suggests individual activity guided by physicians, she said.

The endpoints measured in the two programs were different. "What we looked at primarily was the life years saved," Robertson said. "People would not only live longer but have good quality years. They would add millions of quality-adjusted life years."

People worried about known risk factors should see a physician, she said. "There is a cost to doing that, but it doesn't cost as much as many of the things we think are reasonable. And you get great bang for the buck."

More information
The full report on preventive programs and the money they would save is available from the Trust for America's Health.

http://health.usnews.com/articles/health/healthday/2008/07/17/disease-prevention-programs-worth-the-investment.html

Big Pharma and FDA Seek to Eliminate Vitamin B6 Sales

noreply@blogger.com (Dr. Lanphier) — Fri, 18 Jul 2008 10:50:00 +0000

In another frightening example of pretzel logic that is the unfortunate trade mark of the FDA and Big Pharma conglomerate, a plan is in the works to make it illegal to manufacture or distribute one of nature's many powerful and beneficial substances known as vitamin B6. This would be bad enough if it were an isolated incident, but it is just one of many cases that have surfaced in recent decades that demonstrate the hostile attitude of the powers that be towards those who seek to treat and prevent disease naturally rather than through the use of hazardous chemicals produced by the pharmaceutical industry.

As we discussed earlier this week here on the blog, freedoms of all types, including the freedom to choose how we manage the health or our families, are in serious peril in this land. Perhaps it will get to the point where we will be forced to go "off the grid," so to speak, and remove ourselves from any activity or association with conventional medicine or any type of health insurance. The only way to beat the forces that seek to squeeze us into their mold may be to quit using their services altogether and take care of our own doctoring the way it was done in centuries past. The only other route would be a revolution in this country that restores the rights of us all to practice health care as we best see fit without being persecuted and harassed by ridiculous policies instituted by authorities who are driven and influenced by profits instead of the welfare of the public.

Health Freedom Warning: Drug Company Seeks to Outlaw Vitamin B6 to Protect Pharma Profits
by Mike Adams

(NaturalNews) Big Pharma is constantly finding new ways to destroy the natural supplements market, in much the same way that the American Medical Association once sought to destroy the chiropractic industry (for which it was later found guilty of conspiracy in U.S. courts, by the way). The latest attack against vitamins comes from an FDA petition filed by Medicure Pharma, Inc., which has astonishingly asked the FDA to ban the sale of Vitamin B6!

Vitamin B6, of course, is a naturally-occurring nutrient found in numerous vegetables, nuts and whole grains. Its natural form is called pyridoxal 5'-phosphate or P5P for short. It's an essential nutrient for expectant mothers, growing children and anyone who wishes to be healthy. It's absolutely crucial for healthy blood cell function, and it's used in over 100 enzymatic reactions involving protein metabolism.

So why would a pharmaceutical company petition the FDA to outlaw the sale of this essential nutrient? It's simple: Because Big Pharma wants to market its own form of Vitamin B6 and call it a "drug."

Medicure Pharma, Inc., has been studying the clinical effects of Vitamin B6 (which they call "MC-1") on humans. This is part of a process for receiving FDA approval on MC-1 as a "drug," and then marketing this drug through the conventional medical system (and selling it at markups that can reach 500,000% over the cost of the actual ingredients).

This issue was reported by the Alliance for Natural Health, an outstanding health freedom organization that deserves your support. You can read about this Vitamin B6 issue (along with links to the petition) at: http://www.anhcampaign.org/news/hand-ph...

Obviously, it is in the financial interest of Medicure Pharma, Inc. to not only receive FDA approval for their "MC-1" version of Vitamin B6; it's also crucial to eliminate the competition. After all, if people knew MC-1 was just Vitamin B6, they could go out and buy it on their own, for a fraction of the price of a prescription drug. This is most likely why Medicure Pharma petitioned the FDA to outlaw Vitamin B6 supplements: It's the simplest and easiest way to eliminate the competition and guarantee profits!

Screwy logic, biopiracy and Big Pharma scams
So what's the logic behind banning Vitamin B6? It's simple: Medicare Pharma wants the FDA to declare Vitamin B6 to be "adulterated" because it contains a drug. Which drug does it contain? Well, MC-1, of course!

Do you see the circular reasoning here? Vitamin B6 is a naturally-occurring vitamin, but if a drug company gets FDA approval on Vitamin B6 (with a different name), then that very same drug company can petition the FDA to ban Vitamin B6, claiming it contains their drug!

I know this sounds incredibly stupid. And it is. But it isn't unprecedented. In fact, the very same thing happened with red yeast rice.

A few years ago, drug companies discovered that red yeast rice (a natural supplement) contained powerful, natural compounds that balance cholesterol levels. These compounds are called lovastatins (sound familiar?)

Drug companies ripped off the lovastatin molecules from red yeast rice, then patented them. Once they achieved FDA approval for their "statin drugs," it was easy to file a petition requesting the outlawing of red yeast rice, claiming the supplement was "adulterated" with drugs! Which drugs? Statin drugs, of course -- the very same drugs that were isolated from red yeast rice in the first place!

This is why the FDA has been on a terror campaign to outlaw red yeast rice supplements. They've sent warning letters to online retailers and threatened numerous companies with legal action. The point of all this is to eliminate red yeast rice from the marketplace because it competes with statin drugs. And it's the exact same strategy now being following by Medicure Pharma in its attempt to get the FDA to ban Vitamin B6.

Was it a move out of financial desperation?
Medicure Pharma, by the way, is losing its shirt. It recently received notice from the American Stock Exchange that it would be "delisted" because it no longer meets the minimum requirement for shareholder equity vs. ongoing fiscal losses. In other words, the company is losing too much money and has too little shareholder equity to even stay listed in the American Stock Exchange.

This might explain its decision to petition the FDA to outlaw the sale of Vitamin B6 (P5P). If consumers were unable to buy the vitamins, many would have no choice but to seek out the company's own patented, high-profit MC-1 version of the vitamin, and that would generate a windfall of profits!

Making money in the pharmaceutical industry, you see, is not about helping people in any real way; it's about limiting their options, controlling the marketplace, and forcing people to buy products from you at monopoly prices.

This is, in fact, the underlying business model of the entire pharmaceutical industry: Selling drugs at monopoly prices while outlawing competing products. Any approval by the FDA is, in effect, a license to engage in monopolistic market practices. And remarkably, the FDA even enforces this monopoly by threatening, intimidating and raiding the warehouses of competing product companies, especially if they're in the "natural" products industry.

Even more remarkably, the FTC, which claims to protect fair market practices in the United States, has utterly ignored the monopoly practices of Big Pharma. Yes, the same government office that went after Microsoft for creating a "monopoly" user interface in Windows seems to have no interest whatsoever in going after drug companies engaged in widespread, fraudulent monopoly marketing practices that are bankrupting the entire nation! (How's that for selective enforcement of trade practices?)

We must either stop the FDA, or lose all access to herbs and supplements
Do you see where all this is ultimately headed? If the FDA is allowed to keep banning nutritional supplements while promoting the very same drugs synthesized from those natural sources, it could allow Big Pharma to commit widespread biopiracy, stealing all the good medicine from nature, claiming patent protection on the useful molecules, and getting the FDA to outlaw virtually all the natural substances from which those medicines were first derived.

It's not a particularly brilliant strategy, but it is exceedingly effective at defrauding the public out of trillions of dollars in dishonest profits. And the fact that this is going on today gives additional support to something I've proposed for quite some time: Ending all patent protection on medicines, genes and seeds.

I say, there should never be a financial incentive for corporations to deny the People access to information and products that could halt disease, end suffering, and enhance their health. And yet today's conventional medical system is set up precisely to profit from the ongoing disease of the People.
It is a system that offers no cures, no education and no honest information to the public about real health solutions. It only offers a lifetime of ever-more-expensive patented pharmaceuticals that lead to a downward spiral of bad health and bad debt until more and more American families are left diseased and penniless, victims of a profiteering system of medicine that trades lives for profits as the foundation of its business model.

It is time for radical -- revolutionary, in fact! -- changes to our system of medicine, and I believe that begins by ending all patent protection for medicines, genes and seeds. These things belong to ALL the People, not just the rich, white fat cats who take home $300 million annual salaries by fraudulently selling dangerous prescription medications to people who are only harmed by them.

Watch NaturalNews tomorrow, for I'll be publishing a grassroots action article that dares to call for revolutionary action designed to rebuild a new health care system following the coming collapse of the American Empire.
You sense it coming, don't you? A year ago, you were skeptical, but now you know it's true: Skyrocketing fuel prices, hiking food prices, collapsing real estate bubbles, the demise of the U.S. dollar in international markets, failed wars and massive inflation caused by the Fed's bailout of rich white bankers... these are all signs of a modern Roman Empire that's about to collapse under the weight of its debt, disease and disastrous war mongering.

The end of American as we know it is coming. And it will be replaced by a new nation, built upon the ideas of people like you and me (those of us who can still think clearly because we're not all drugged out on Ambien...)
So read NaturalNews tomorrow to learn about what we need to do after the coming collapse of the U.S. government to rebuild a nation based in individual liberties, Free Speech, true health and respect for nature.
In the mean time if you want to send your comments to the FDA on this Vitamin B6 petition, the web page for you to file a comment on this Vitamin B6 issue is located here: http://www.regulations.gov/fdmspublic/c...

To file a comment, you have to click the little text balloon beside the phrase "Add Comments." It's difficult to find on the page, which just goes to show you that the FDA isn't really interested in people adding comments in the first place.

Be sure to also visit the Alliance for Natural Health at www.ANHcampaign.org

http://www.naturalnews.com/023514.html

Scandalous Corruption Within the FDA

noreply@blogger.com (Dr. Lanphier) — Thu, 17 Jul 2008 10:42:00 +0000

The following article holds no punches when it comes to exposing the shameful network between the FDA, pharmaceutical companies, and the justice system, and how these relationships have sacrificed the lives of countless Americans on the altar of the almighty buck. Fortunes are being made off of dangerous chemicals that are being passed off as beneficial medicines or food additives, and regulatory agencies are turning a blind eye to it all, or even worse, participating directly in the deception.

The United States is on the verge of becoming a police state that is run by out of control government agencies whose employees are not elected and are therefore not held accountable to the public or the laws of this land. In order for sanity to return and the American people to recover their lost rights, deep and significant change must occur that can only be accomplished through a revolution within the leadership of this country. However, the political system being what it is, the odds are stacked against anyone that seeks to defy the establishment and usher in a return to common sense and true freedom for the masses.

Ron Paul, a recent candidate for President, is a classic example of this David and Goliath type of situation. Mr. Paul has a ton of wonderful ideas about government that truly serves the people instead of lining their own pockets, but he was not able to overcome and get his name on the ballot this November. However, all hope is not lost! After pulling out of the Presidential race, Paul is encouraging his supporters to get involved in grassroot politics at the local and regional level. He believes this is the most powerful way to bring about substantial change in Washington, and I tend to agree; however, I would love to see a March on Washington for Health Freedom. If enough of us stand up and become proactively involved, perhaps we will see a return to the America that our forefathers fought and died for. Don't hesitate to make sure that your representatives know where you stand concerning health issues and health freedoms. Hold them accountable and find out where they stand. If we neglect to make sure our voice is heard and our vote is counted, we may wake up one morning to news that natural vitamins, supplements and natural health modalities now require a prescription from your MD who hasn't a clue about natural health and healing. It's happened this quickly in other countries, let's not allow it to happen here.

HOW MANY MORE WILL DIE BEFORE FDA GHOULS ARE HELD ACCOUNTABLE?
By: DevvyJuly 14, 2008
Copyright 2008 - NewsWithViews.com

The American people have grown up with so many federal alphabet soup agencies, they've become immune to the dastardly deeds done by these unelected officials - except when it hits their home. When I refer to the FDA, I don't mean the Federal Drug Administration, I mean the Federal Death Administration. This agency derives its jurisdiction from treaties and has been getting away with destroying people's health for decades, and in too many cases, the result is death. The FDA is nothing more than another out of control agency answerable to no one. It needs to be abolished. While I was still writing news items for NWVs back in 2004, I wrote a piece on Donald Rumsfeld and aspartame. The mail came flooding in with accusations that aspartame was perfectly safe because the ghouls at the FDA said so! I followed up the deluge with a column under my own by-line; Aspartame Concerns - Junk Science, Quack Doctors?

Dr. Betty Martini has been a pioneer in exposing the devastating effects of ingesting that deadly chemical. Naturally, she's been attacked on a regular basis as have doctors and scientists who have studied the effects of aspartame on the human body - particularly the brain. Anyone who dares expose the truth which cuts into the profits of the big pharma houses is persecuted by the ghouls at the Federal Death Administration. Many are political prisoners for doing nothing more than trying to naturally treat their patients.

This is especially true for the multi-billion dollar a year cancer industry; see The Cancer Research Money Machines. Since I wrote that column almost two years ago, more "safe" drugs and treatments, given the stamp of approval by the Federal Death Administration, have proven fatal. Let's start with Gardasil, a new, deadly vaccine that I've covered in previous columns:

July 3, 2008. From the Desk of Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton: Judicial Watch Uncovers Shocking New FDA Documents Related to Gardasil

"Those of you who regularly read this column know that Judicial Watch has taken the lead in exposing the ugly truth about the dangerous side effects associated with Gardasil, the vaccination for human papillomavirus (HPV) currently being administered to young girls.

"Well this week, we released a special report based on new "adverse event reports" and other information obtained from the FDA under the Freedom of Information Act. These reports document 10 reported deaths since September, 2007. (The total number of death reports is at least 18 and as many as 20.) The FDA also produced 140 "serious" reports (27 of which were categorized as "life threatening"), 10 spontaneous abortions and six cases of Guillain-Barre Syndrome - all since January 2008. Here are a few excerpts from the documents we uncovered. The rest can be read in our report. (Warning: These descriptions get very graphic.)"

July 7, 2008. Should parents worry about HPV vaccine? "7,802 "adverse event" reports to CDC since Gardasil was approved. Reports claim drug caused nausea and paralysis -- even death."

Only after enough Americans die or thousands have their health destroyed, does the FDA pull some of these dangerous drugs:

October 8, 2007, FDA pulls Drug for Stomach Ills Is Pulled From the Market: rug for Stomach Ills Is Pulled From the Market: Zelnorm...Arthritis Drug Bextra Pulled: "The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) today requested Pfizer recall arthritis drug Bextra (valdexocib) and change the warning label on Celebrex (celecoxib)...Parkinson's disease drug pulled from market: "The FDA pulled a Parkinson's drug from the market after reports of heart valve damage in more than a dozen patients. Pergolide is sold under the name Permax and is believed to raise the risk of heart valve damage by 20 percent." "FDA Okays Stomach Drugs Prilosec And Nexium, For Now. Diabetes drug should be pulled over heart risks, FDA scientist says; Avandia."

How about the widely popular, HRT (hormone replacement therapy) drug, Prempro, found in the government's own study to increase a healthy woman's risk of breast cancer by 24%, stroke by 41% and heart attack by 29%?

April 24, 2007. 70 women 'die each year from cancer after taking HRT. "But the UK-sponsored Million Women Study now suggests HRT resulted in 1,300 extra cases of ovarian cancer between 1991 and 2005. Of these women, 1,000 died of the disease."

2008: Wyeth, Pfizer ordered to pay $27 million in punitive damages. "A Little Rock, Ark., federal jury found Wyeth Pharmaceuticals and Upjohn (a Pfizer unit) liable for $27 million in punitive damages to Donna Scroggin, who sued the drug manufacturers in 2004 after developing breast cancer after taking hormone replacement therapy. The award includes $19.3 million from Wyeth and $7.7 from Upjohn.

"Wyeth manufactures Premarin, an estrogen replacement, and Prempro, which is a combination of estrogen and progestin. These, along with Upjohn's Provera, which contains progestin, are commonly prescribed to treat the unpleasant effects of menopause....About 25 million American women use hormone replacement therapy (HRT) to ease the discomfort of menopause. There are about 5,300 similar cases pending across the country for Premarin and Prempro."

Here's a news flash: These dangerous cocktails are still on the market and being prescribed! I've never taken any form of HRT and am truly thankful I listened to my friend, Dr. Lorraine Day, 14 years ago. The 25 million women who use HRT's in this country just might be 'concerned' they will end up dead from breast and/or cervical cancer. I don't understand why anyone would take these drugs once you read the side effects: "Long-term treatment with Prempro may increase your risk of breast cancer, heart attack, or stroke." To help with hot flashes? Perhaps women should try natural supplements (Evening Primrose Oil, Dong Quai, Black Cohash) and a good 100% Mexican Yam progersterone cream for hot flashes. Okay, I have to give the disclaimer: I'm not a doctor nor am I making a medical referral here. I wouldn't want the Nazi's from the Department of Fatherland Security to charge me with some federal crime, i.e., prescribing natural supplements without the approval of the ghouls at the FDA.

People ask me all the time why can't Americans see what's happening in this country? Why the apathy? Well, a number of reasons: ignorance of the facts, blind loyalty to their political party; they take our freedoms for granted while distracted by meaningless past times likes sports and the mall, as well as being poorly educated on the history of this constitutional republic. I also believe it's because we have a nation of sick and dying people by the millions who are incapable of analyzing the big picture. Americans have been ingesting deadly chemicals into their bodies for decades, courtesy of the FDA. Aspartame is dangerous to your brain; please read this important warning. Aspartame is in most commercial yogurts, diet soft drinks and thousands of food products.

What about fluoride?

Germans and Russians Used Fluoride to Make Prisoners Stupid and Docile

"While a member of the Communist Party, I attended Communist underground training schools outside the City of New York.. Here, under the tutoring of Eugene Dennis, M. Sparks, Morris Chyilds, Jack Kling and others, we were schooled in the art of revolutionary overthrow of the established Government. We discussed quite thoroughly the fluoridation of water supplies and how we were using it in Russia as a tranquilizer in the prison camps. The leaders of our school felt that if it could be induced into the American water supply, it would bring about a spirit of lethargy in the nation; where it would keep the general public docile during a steady encroachment of Communism...We discussed in these schools, the complete art of revolution: the seizure of the main utilities, such as light, power, gas and water, but it was felt by the leadership that if a program of fluoridating the water could be carried out in the nation, it would go a long way toward the advancement of the revolution." Oliver Kenneth Goff, 1957

Americans have been drinking this deadly poison for almost as long as I've been alive. I stopped drinking any tap water 41 years ago; I don't even give it to my dogs or cook with it. A couple hundred million Americans brush their teeth with it everyday, it's in most commercial mouth washes and dentists use it on their patients. So, you have mass ingestion of aspartame, cooking people's brain and destroying their bodies while enriching the big pharmaceutical companies for more drugs to treat the results of aspartame poisoning! Douse the masses with fluoride to make them apathetic, lethargic and unable to resist. In other words, little better than cattle, controlled using the herding technique. I hate to put it that way, but I also hate what's been done to my fellow Americans. Yes, without question, certain drugs and vaccines are safe and they have benefited mankind in remarkable ways. But, that does not excuse the shoddy science being used by manufacturers who cover up the results and then get bad drugs approved by their coconspirators at the FDA.

One emailer, Captain Bobby, kept sending me requests to expose what he calls a lyme disease epidemic. He asked me with deep frustration in his emails why I wouldn't expose this and how people like him are suffering 24/7? If I wrote ten columns a day, eight days a week, I couldn't cover the thousand cuts killing this nation and our people. However, in the mini-master file discussed below, I have included credible information on lyme disease -- including denials that it's even a problem!

Then, there is the real danger from the chemical cocktails being dropped on this country called chemtrails. I've done many columns on this human and environmental disaster; new material is included in the mini-master file discussed below.

There isn't room in this column to list all the articles and studies I have been saving, so what I've done is put them in this mini-master file for you to read over the weekend or when ever you can. Nothing is more important than good health. For you and your family. Also, I strongly recommend you listen to Dr. Sherry Tenpenny during a recent interview on KAJO Radio during the Carl Wilson show. Sherry is an expert regarding vaccines and your right to say no. Every parent in America needs to read her columns and listen to this interview. I have four brothers and sisters. Like our parents, the only vaccines we had were smallpox, diphtheria and polio. I also made sure my daughter received only those three. Thank, God.

How many more Americans will die, have strokes or suffer life long medical problems from deadly chemicals and treatments approved by the FDA? These poltroons in Congress who also own stock in pharmaceutical companies, continue to pass legislation to protect their big $$ donors and dividend checks, while parents try to cope with sick or dying children they love so much. Do you not cry for them? Congress has given these drug peddlers immunity more times than you can imagine to protect them from lawsuits. Look at the hundreds of billions of dollars in settlements, enriching lawyers like former presidential candidate, John Edwards, after these drugs given the "safe" label by the FDA, turned out to be a killer or laid low thousands of Americans by stokes and heart attacks?

Is the head of the FDA (past and present) ever held accountable? NO. They just resign and move on to another lucrative job if there's some heat. How about their lackeys? NO. You can sue the federal government, but it's a nightmare. Why should we the people continue paying taxes for settlements when the people who caused the problem (FDA) are never held accountable?

The honchos at the FDA who do the approving of these deadly cocktails walk around with impunity because they know from past history that these cowards in Congress will not hold them accountable. I believe at the very least, the head of the FDA and his underlings should be indicted by a grand jury for conspiracy to commit murder, reckless disregard for human life and any other charges a grand jury in any of the 50 states can find that applies -- if you could get jurisdiction using the same legal basis as Bugliosi did in his book, The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder. It's a slam dunk the corrupt Federal Department of Justice under Attorney General Michael Mukasey, won't lift a finger for justice for the victims.

The FDA pulls these deadly drugs off the market - AFTER people like my brother have a major stroke that almost kills him (VIOXX). Then, the head of the FDA goes back to business as usual and power lunches in DC with his big pharma house buddies and is NEVER held accountable. I say it's long past time these people are held accountable in the criminal justice system. Giving these unelected officials immunity after wreaking such death and destruction on the American people cannot and must not be allowed to continue. This will NOT happen if the American people vote back in the same incumbents who have done nothing to stop the FDA's madness other than more meaningless hearings. Change cannot happen with the same players. In the meantime, dangerous drugs are still on the market and unsuspecting Americans will die or their health destroyed, requiring them to spend even more money for the pharmaceutical companies (pills) to "treat them." Don't you think it's time to hold Congress and the FDA officials accountable?

http://www.newswithviews.com/Devvy/kidd376.htm

Contaminated Foods Rise with Surge in Imports

noreply@blogger.com (Dr. Lanphier) — Wed, 16 Jul 2008 13:14:00 +0000

As authorities in the United States seek to deal with the rising number of food imports and insufficient agency budgets to adequately monitor the safety of these products, consumers are exposed to an ever-growing risk for food-borne illnesses. As today's article points out, the inspection of the foods coming into this country falls dangerously short, and outbreaks of salmonella and other conditions with sometimes fatal consequences have become all too common.

This situation brings a couple of issues to light. First, it reinforces the benefits of growing our own organic fruits, vegetables, and herbs whenever possible, as this is the best way to guarantee the safety and nutritional quality of such foods. Even people who live in urban areas can practice container gardening. Secondly, as the problem of tainted food continues to grow, this opens up the door for the FDA and other government agencies to step in and seize greater control of the food supply, limiting sources only to ones they approve. Of course, this would likely mean a huge increase in genetically modified and irradiated foods, under the guise of protecting the food supply from contamination, and would also make it difficult, if not downright illegal, for individuals to grow their own food or raise their own farm animals and other agricultural products. We are already seeing this happen through the control of seed by such companies as Monsanto, with the full support and cooperation of the government.

When you do purchase produce, be sure to wash it thoroughly before consuming. I recommend washing your produce in a sink filled with filtered or distilled water along with a capful of hydrogen peroxide or a capful of our Oxy-SC. Be sure to allow leafy vegetables to soak for 10-15 minutes. It is also advisable to carefully choose your restaurants, as food can also be contaminated from unsanitary preparation or poor hygiene habits on the part of food handlers. Be particularly cautious if you or a family member suffers from a condition that compromises your immune system.

Surging food imports outpace inspection
Safety concerns rise as FDA looks at Mexico as a source of salmonella- tainted tomatoes.

By Laurence Iliff and Alfredo Corchado
DALLAS MORNING NEWS

LAREDO, Texas - Day after day, Mexican trucks line up as far as the eye can see for entry to the United States at the World Trade Bridge, carrying everything from raw tomatoes, broccoli and fresh basil to frozen seafood. They also bring in small amounts of salmonella, listeria, restricted pesticides, and other food poisons.

Customs and Border Protection officers take less than a minute per truck to determine which products enter the country and find their way into grocery stores and restaurants across North Texas.

Most trucks are waved through. The avalanche of imported goods, especially food from Mexico, is too much for the limited number of inspectors at the nation's 300 ports of entry to effectively screen, critics say. And the sheer volume makes it impossible for them to carry out their mission: protecting the U.S. food supply and American consumers.

Concerns about the nation's food inspection system are gaining urgency - especially as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration looks at Mexico as a likely source of salmonella-tainted tomatoes that have sickened more than 800 people in the last two months. The FDA last month sent inspectors to three Mexican states - Jalisco, Sinaloa and Coahuila - to check farms and packing plants.

The great majority of the food that crosses the southern U.S. border is safe, U.S. officials say. But a surge in imports in recent years means that the system of border inspections is badly strained and in urgent need of repair, the officials acknowledge.

"We have this huge growth in imports, this huge growth in trade; at the same time we have severely cut back on our regulatory agencies and their ability to do their job, especially the food portion of the Food and Drug Administration," said Jean Halloran, director of food policy initiatives for Consumers Union, which publishes Consumer Reports magazine.

"If they are only checking 1 percent of the stuff and finding lots of problems, then ... there are a lot of problems that are never caught," she said.

Overall, about 15 percent of the U.S. food supply and 60 percent of fresh fruits and vegetables consumed are imported, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Economic Research Service.

Mexico is the second-largest foreign source (Canada is No. 1) of agricultural products and seafood for the United States - moving to No. 1 during the winter months and filling about 60 percent of the supermarket produce aisle. And it's the worst offender when it comes to food shipments turned away at the border by U.S. inspectors, a review of food rejections shows.

The problem, officials and analysts say, is the result of sometimes substandard agricultural practices south of the border, and a U.S. food inspection system that has become so overwhelmed that President Bush endorsed a 50-step plan that would put more emphasis on inspections in the countries of origin.

The in-country system would put U.S. inspectors in foreign countries or use third parties to check products before they are shipped to the United States. It also would give the FDA mandatory recall powers over food products. Currently, the agency negotiates "voluntary" recalls.

Both consumer groups and an internal FDA study group said the proposed Bush plan to fix the current system "within available resources" was far too modest.

"We can state unequivocally that the system cannot be fixed 'within available resources,' " the agency's subcommittee on science and technology said in a report late last year. The subcommittee called the inspection rate "appallingly low."

In fairness to Mexico, U.S. food producers were the subject of far more expansive recalls last year than foreign producers, including recalls of California spinach that tested positive for E. coli and was blamed for three deaths, and of 22 million pounds of frozen beef hamburger patties, also because of a dangerous strain of that common bacteria.

"I must emphasize that by and large, the food traded is very safe," said Suzanne Heinen, the USDA's counselor for agricultural affairs at the U.S. Embassy in Mexico City. "We have very few problems, especially when you consider the volume of trade that crosses the border every day."

Still, food imports remain on Washington's radar - particularly in light of the latest salmonella outbreak.

U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Michael Leavitt announced plans recently to open a food safety monitoring office in Latin America, similar to three being planned for China. He did not say which country might house the office.

Another recent recall targeting Mexican agriculture is an example of what consumer groups say is wrong with the system.

In December, officials took a sample for testing from a 5,500-pound load of Mexican basil moving through the Otay Mesa border crossing in San Diego. The basil continued on its way and was sold to restaurants and other customers in California, Texas and Illinois the next day.

When the test results came back two weeks later, they suggested salmonella contamination, sparking a late recall.

Mexico has been the subject of other recent recalls as well:

In February 2007, the FDA recalled 672 cartons of Mexican cantaloupes after a sample analysis found salmonella, which can cause fever, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain and arterial infections.

In September, the FDA recalled a hard, dry cheese from Mexico that it suspected was contaminated with salmonella.

And in early December, the Texas Department of State Health Services announced the voluntary recall of several Mexican candies after tests showed high lead levels. Lead can harm mental and physical development in children and unborn babies. California had banned the candies in August.

A top Mexican health official acknowledged that some Mexican food producers cut corners to boost their profits or have simply not adopted modern safety measures, although they have made great strides in recent years.

For example, chile peppers are often spread out to dry on the ground, where they can pick up lead or pesticides only approved for other crops.

"In Mexico, we have a lot of work to do," said Maria Esther Diaz Carrillo, a chemist and food technician at Mexico's Federal Commission to Prevent Sanitary Risks, part of the Health Ministry. "We also have producers who are very conscientious ... of the risks associated with their products and truly dedicated to public health. In some cases, it's ignorance."

http://www.philly.com/inquirer/health_science/20080714_Surging_food_imports_outpace_inspection.html

Why It's Crucial to Eat Wild Fish

noreply@blogger.com (Dr. Lanphier) — Tue, 15 Jul 2008 12:59:00 +0000

Most Americans are likely aware that eating fish a couple of times per week is a nutritious and healthy habit that can be particularly good for one's heart. But it is also important that the right type of fish is eaten. Unfortunately, all fish are not created equally, and the issue becomes even more complex when farm-raised fish are put into the equation.

The fish that are highest in heart-friendly omega-3 fatty acids include such species as salmon, herring, and mackerel. However, fish that is raised on a farm does not provide the same benefits as wild fish, and can in fact do more harm than good, as the article below discusses. Farm-raised fish are typically given the cheapest feed available, which often pollutes them with pesticides, genetically modified ingredients, and can change the body chemistry of the fish so that it little resembles the same species found in the wild. Tilapia is an excellent example of a fish that is easily available and relatively inexpensive, but which can mislead consumers into thinking they are making a healthy choice.

Eating wild-caught fish in moderation is a great addition to your diet, but beware that the same species that are highest in omega-3 also tend to contain greater amounts of mercury and other heavy metals. Supplementation by consuming other sources of omega-3 such as organic flax seed, flax seed oil, hemp seed oil, or hemp-seed milk is also recommended as an alternative way to pursue wellness.

Popular Tilapia Might Not Help Heart
Study finds farm-raised fish has high levels of unhealthy omega-6 fatty acids

Posted July 11, 2008
By Amanda GardnerHealthDay Reporter

FRIDAY, July 11 (HealthDay News) -- The wildly popular farm-raised fish known as tilapia may actually harm your heart, thanks to low levels of healthy omega-3 fatty acids and high levels of unhealthy omega-6 fatty acids.

New research suggests the combination could be particularly bad for patients with heart disease, arthritis, asthma and other diseases involving overactive inflammatory responses.

"If you're in a vulnerable population such as a heart disease patient, you need to be very careful with what you're eating, and that includes everything," said senior study author Dr. Floyd H. Chilton, director of Wake Forest Center for Botanical Lipids, in Winston-Salem, N.C. "But when it comes to fish, there's not a more important thing you can do for heart disease than eat the right type of fish or take dietary fish oil. There is evidence that you may harm yourself by eating the wrong kind of fish, and [farmed] tilapia and catfish are the two that fall into that category."

"I don't think that this is an issue for everyone, any more than eating a hamburger is an issue for everyone," Chilton added.

The study was published in the July issue of the Journal of the American Dietetic Association.

As for suppliers, "the industry needs to improve ways of farming fish," said Katherine Tallmadge, a national spokeswoman for the American Dietetic Association. "The whole idea of farming is a great one, but they're feeding the fish food that's inexpensive, so they can keep the price down, and it's having an adverse effect on the nutritional quality of the fish."

Several health groups, including the American Heart Association, recommend eating two servings of fish a week, preferably fatty fish such as salmon. The reason: primarily to increase omega-3 fatty acids.

But no one has really looked at the nutritional effect of an explosion in farmed fish (increasing at an annual rate of 9.2 percent, compared with 1.4 percent for wild fish). In particular, inexpensive tilapia is exploding in popularity.

This study used gas chromatography to analyze the fatty acid composition of 30 widely consumed farmed and wild fish.

Farmed trout and Atlantic salmon had relatively good concentrations of "good" omega-3 fatty acids compared with "bad" omega-6 fatty acids.

Farm-raised tilapia and catfish, on the other hand, had troubling ratios.

Tallmadge recommends looking for wild fish. Wild salmon, even canned wild salmon, has high levels of omega-3s and is an excellent source of protein. "It can be fairly economical," she said. "I buy frozen salmon at Trader Joe's for about $7 a pound, that's $2 a serving."

Concentrate on cold-water fish such as salmon, rainbow trout, sardines, tuna and anchovies, all of which have healthy fats, added Marianne Grant, a health educator with Texas A&M Health Science Centers Coastal Bend Health Education Center, in Corpus Christi.

"In the 1970s, we lost the ability to feed the planet with fish we catch," Chilton said. "Farm-raised fish has to be part of our future, but we must do it correctly. We must feed animals the correct foods. Animals become what we feed them, and we become what we eat as well. The food chain is fairly consistent."

http://health.usnews.com/articles/health/healthday/2008/07/11/popular-tilapia-might-not-help-heart_print.htm

Hospital Stays Can Be Very Hazardous to Your Health

noreply@blogger.com (Dr. Lanphier) — Mon, 14 Jul 2008 12:50:00 +0000

The number of serious errors involving medications and other procedures in American hospitals is outrageously high, and common-sense safety / check and balance regimens that can help prevent such disasters are long overdue. Why hospitals and pharmacies have not instituted such changes already is a great mystery. The sheer volume of patients and the wide variety of drugs that are employed is a recipe for tragedy, but unfortunately it apparently takes some high profile cases such as those highlighted in the following article before anything is done.

Surgeons are now talking about check lists that would become a routine part of the surgical procedure, a system that has been used in parts of Europe and certain other countries of the world for some time with great success. I recently heard one American surgeon state that he did not think a check list was necessary, but that since he agreed to try it, there has not been a day in the last six months that he did not catch something he likely would have missed without this precautionary measure.

If you or your children are hospitalized or prescribed any medication, please be sure to double check that you have the right drug and the right strength, as there are literally tens of thousands of errors every year. It is a good idea to do your own research as to possible side effects as well. You may run into a doctor or other health care provider that is arrogantly offended by your queries, but most will understand and agree that this is a wise and necessary step in order to protect your family and prevent a potential crisis.

Hospital error blamed for more infant overdoses
By CHRISTOPHER SHERMAN, Associated Press Writer
Fri Jul 11, 8:56 PM ET

The case of 14 babies who received accidental overdoses while in intensive care has raised new questions about how a common blood-thinning medication could be given to infants repeatedly in the wrong dosage.

Unlike a previous case involving twins of actor Dennis Quaid, the Texas newborns got the overdose because of an error at the hospital pharmacy, not a labeling problem.

Quaid sued one of heparin's manufacturers last year after his children's overdose was traced to a hospital pharmacy worker who grabbed vials of the wrong dosage because the labels looked almost identical if turned a certain way.

In Corpus Christi, pharmacy workers at Christus Spohn Hospital South made what the hospital called a "mixing error." The two workers went on voluntary leave.

The heparin, which was 100 times stronger than recommended, was given to 14 infants in the hospital's neonatal intensive care unit on July 4.

Two of the babies involved -- twins who were born one month premature -- have died, although the hospital said its physicians have found no direct links to the overdose. Autopsies are being performed.

In addition to the 14 infants, three other babies who were discharged shortly after the overdoses may also have received too much heparin, but they showed no ill effects.

Nurses discovered the error Sunday and immediately gave the hospitalized infants a drug to counteract the effects.

At a news conference Friday, the grandmother of the children who died said the family was devastated as it prepared to hold funerals for the babies on Saturday, the same day relatives had planned a baby shower for their mother.

"We want answers," Maggie Chapa said. "We want to know what happened."

A patient safety expert said hospitals are often slow to change.

"It is frustrating to people that we have had other heparin issues," said Diane Pinakiewicz, president of the National Patient Safety Foundation.

"When you have complex systems interfacing with humans, we're never going to have perfection," she added. But "our job is to get as close to perfection at all times."

Hospitals around the nation have made changes to the way they handle heparin, which is one of the most common additives to intravenous solutions.

For example, at Texas Children's Hospital in Houston, vials of heparin are no longer available in the neonatal intensive care unit. Nurses must get it directly from the pharmacy. That would not have helped in the Corpus Christi case, where the error was made in the pharmacy, but it may have avoided a situation like the one that threatened Quaid's twins in Los Angeles.

"You always have to go on the premise that somebody is going to make a mistake," said Dr. Eric Eichenwald, medical director of the unit. "So you have to make it really, really hard to make a mistake."

In 2006, Methodist Hospital in Indianapolis gave six babies doses 1,000 times stronger than recommended. Vials of the wrong dosage of the drug had been placed in a medicine cabinet in the neonatal intensive care unit, and nurses didn't catch the mistake before the babies were given the medication. Three of those infants died.

Pharmacy technicians normally placed premeasured vials of a less concentrated form of heparin in a computerized drug cabinet. Nurses then had to enter their personal code and the specific patient's code to open the cabinet. When the drawer opened to display an assortment of drugs, the nurse would select the correct one and then enter the amount withdrawn.

But the pharmacy technician mistakenly placed in the cabinet a more concentrated form of heparin.

The following year, at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles, two pharmacy technicians failed to verify the correct concentration of the heparin they placed in the pediatrics ward. Quaid's twins, as well as another infant, received doses similar in strength to those given in Indianapolis.

The nurses who administered the drug also failed to check the dosage. All three children recovered.

Quaid sued Baxter Healthcare Corp. for negligence, arguing that the two concentrations of the drug looked almost identical. The company had already changed its packaging to add a red caution label that had to be torn off before opening.

Cedars-Sinai instituted additional training and required that four pharmacy technicians verify such "high-alert" medications before putting them in any hospital units.

Earlier this year, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration also investigated hundreds of cases of adverse reactions to injections of heparin made by Baxter International. The reactions were blamed on a tainted supply originating in China.

The tainted heparin was not involved in the Texas case, Baxter said.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080712/ap_on_re_us/blood_thinner_deaths&printer=1;_ylt=Ah1xSnOssmI3OQPKSdpI1GRH2ocA

Western Decadence Takes Its Toll on China

noreply@blogger.com (Dr. Lanphier) — Fri, 11 Jul 2008 14:21:00 +0000

For thousands of years, the Chinese have generally been some of the healthiest people on earth, suffering far less from the epidemic of modern debilitating diseases that have become so common in much of the rest of the world. Now, however, their culture, which included a quality, whole foods diet and large of amounts of physical exercise due to their primarily agricultural economy, is being decimated by the poor lifestyle habits that have flooded in from the West.

This is a tragic turn of events that is a seemingly inevitable result of the globalization of world economies. Free enterprise and affluence has benefited many people in developing nations, but they do, unfortunately, have a dark side as well. Hopefully wisdom will prevail, and the Chinese can be educated as to both the dangers of a poor diet and the benefits of pursuing a lifestyle of wellness. Let's hope that Big Pharma will not be able to unleash their propaganda in China, with their sights set on millions of new customers for their statin drugs and other toxic ways of supposedly dealing with obesity and connected health problems.

Quarter of Chinese adults are overweight, obese: US study
Tue Jul 8, 1:32 PM ET

Declining physical activity and a shift towards a Western diet are driving up obesity rates in China, with more than 25 percent of adults now considered overweight or obese, a study warned Tuesday.

Researchers writing in the July/August issue of the journal Health Affairs predicted these rates would double by 2028 unless the Chinese government took action -- with the rest of the developing world likely to follow suit.

"What's happening in China should be seen as a marker for what is going to hit the rest of the developing world if we fail to act," said study author Barry Popkin, a professor of nutrition at the Carolina Population Center at the University of North Carolina.

"We need to find the right investments and regulations to encourage people to adopt a healthy lifestyle, or we risk facing higher rates of death, disease and disability, and the related costs."

Deaths from diseases linked to poor diet, including coronary heart disease and cancer, have increased from 48 percent in 1985 to 61.8 percent today in urban areas, and from 34.5 percent to almost 46 percent in rural areas.

The researchers blame changes in the Chinese diet, to include more eggs and meat and fewer vegetables and carbohydrates, and a shift away from physically demanding jobs such as farming to more sedentary, service-sector work.

The study also notes the increase in television and car ownership, signaling a more sedentary lifestyle -- the odds of being obese are 80 percent higher for adults in households that own a car than those that do not.

Using data from the China Health and Nutrition Survey, Popkin said 1.2 percent of Chinese adult males became obese or overweight each year in the past decade.

This is a greater increase than in all developing countries except Mexico and than in developed nations such as Australia, Britain and the United States.

Whereas governments in developed countries have taken action to address the problem, Popkin said Beijing needs to do more to encourage its citizens to eat more healthy foods and create environments to stimulate more physical activity.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20080708/hl_afp/chinaushealthobesityresearch&printer=1;_ylt=Ah5Z78rVYZEiscLIC5fcifmKOrgF

Natural Alternative to Drugs for Autism and Mental Illness

noreply@blogger.com (Dr. Lanphier) — Thu, 10 Jul 2008 14:23:00 +0000

I was delighted to see the article below that introduces a drug-free, non-invasive method for managing autism, ADHD, and other conditions in both children and adults. This innovative treatment that provides security and peace of mind for individuals who struggle in social situations that cause them a great amount of stress is a safe, effective option to the hazardous drugs often prescribed such patients. The use of these medications in both adults and children is very alarming, so it is particularly refreshing to see researchers come up with such an excellent alternative that works through the use of a garment that mimics a hug.

Imagine how different our world would be, both for those who suffer from conditions such as autism and for their families and caregivers, if most of the research in the past had been directed towards remedies such as this deep-pressure vest instead of focusing on drugs which seem to help little and burden patients with a number of serious side-effects that often only make their overall condition worse. Most people have bought into the lies that are fed them by the pharmaceutical companies and other parties that support the idea that the answer to illness is a short-term quick "fix" with a chemical that is likely more harmful to the body than beneficial. This is especially true in the area of mental illness, where the use of drugs often turns patients into experimental guinea pigs that end up with a totally unbalanced mind and body after they have been plied with numerous drug cocktails. There must be a better way, and in fact there is. We can only hope that alternative therapies such as this will continue to grow in popularity and influence.

Therapeutic Healing Vest for Children With Autism, ADHD, Anxiety
by Leslee Dru Browning

(NaturalNews) Children with autism and ADHD may soon get anxiety relief from a novel "deep-pressure" vest developed by Brian Mullen at the University of Massachusetts Amherst. The vest, which can also be used for adults with mental illness, delivers a "portable hug" called deep pressure touch stimulation (DPTS).

"People with developmental disorders and mental illness are often overwhelmed in everyday environments such as school and the workplace, and solutions available to families and mental health professionals are limited," says Mullen, a doctoral student of mechanical engineering. "This is an alternative therapy that can safely and discreetly provide the treatment they need to function in mainstream society."

To market the vest, Mullen has created a concept business called Therapeutic Systems, which recently won the $50,000 grand prize in the UMass Amherst Technology Innovation Challenge, a competition for the best entrepreneurial technology business plan produced by students, recent alumni and faculty advisors on campus.

Occupational therapists working with children suffering from autism, ADHD and sensory processing disorders have observed that DPTS can increase attention to tasks and reduce anxiety and harmful behaviors by providing different sensory stimuli. DPTS is also part of a growing trend to improve the lives of adults with mental illness by using touch, sound and aroma to influence alertness, attention and their ability to adapt to their surroundings.

Eight clinical studies of the effectiveness and safety of existing weighted blankets and vests that deliver DPTS were conducted by Mullen and his advisor Sundar Krishnamurty, a professor of mechanical and industrial engineering at UMass Amherst. Mullen used that data to design a prototype system for applying DPTS that can be inserted into any commercial vest or jacket with a lining. Initial results of a study with students at UMass Amherst who did not have autism or ADHD showed that participants preferred Mullen's prototype vest, which applies pressure that feels like a firm hug or swaddling, over the current gold standard weighted vest.

Mullen's prototype has several advantages over weighted or elastic garments and toys currently used to apply DPTS in hospitals and schools. "Existing methods provide limited control over the amount of pressure applied and require some oversight by a caregiver," says Mullen. "Their use is also limited because of the lack of literature documenting their safety, and their tendency to make the user stand out in a crowd."

Therapeutic Systems is also starting the initial phase of designing a DPTS blanket to aid with resting and falling asleep. "Falling asleep has been found to be a major problem for many people with mental illness," says Mullen, who adds that an estimated 65 percent of Americans are losing sleep due to stress."

This novel vest, developed by Brian Mullen, is an ingenious idea. Much safer than taking anxiety and sleep medications

Source: University of Massachusetts Amherst(http://www.umass.edu/newsoffice/)

About the author:
Leslee Dru Browning is a 6th generation Medical Herbalist & Nutritionist from the ancestral line of Patty Bartlett Sessions; Pioneer Mid-Wife & Herbalist. Leslee practiced Medical Herbalism and Nutritional Healing for over 25 years and specialized in Cancer Wellness along with Chronic Illness. She now devotes her career to teaching people, through her writing, about Natural Healing from An Herbal Perspective.

http://www.naturalnews.com/z023585.html

Beware of Hidden Hazards in Products Labeled "Organic"

noreply@blogger.com (Dr. Lanphier) — Wed, 09 Jul 2008 12:47:00 +0000

It is very upsetting to hear about all the toxins found in many personal care products readily available on the shelves of local grocery and drug stores. However, when a company that has gained a solid reputation as an alternative source for clean, "organic" products is found to be using deceptive marketing that exposes their trusting customers to unwanted health hazards, the sense of betrayal is even greater.

There are some lessons to be learned from this unfortunate situation. We cannot blindly trust that any product marked "organic" or "natural" is truly free from toxins, as these words can be manipulated by unscrupulous manufactures and marketing practices to hide certain chemicals, a process referred to as "greenwashing" in the following article. Today's post discusses some of the ways Whole Foods and other parties have been less than truthful about the composition of some of their products, and it also gives us some things to be aware of when purchasing healthful personal care products so that we can avoid being deceived. Unfortunately, when the almighty buck is at stake, what you see is not always what you get. The really sad thing is that these companies do not have to resort to trickery, as there is an ever-growing market for truly safe products that are not poisonous to the body. We as consumers must be sure to thoroughly do our own research before assuming anything that we buy to put on or into our bodies is actually free of unwanted chemical toxins.

Write down ingredient lists, research them, and ask questions of the manufacturer or distributor. There are some great all-natural, safe personal care products available -- however, you may have to search for them as usually they are from smaller companies not able to compete in places like Whole Foods or the most popular vitamin store. Do your homework and don't allow anything on your skin that is toxic or questionable.

California Suit Against Whole Foods for Carcinogen in Body Care Products, with Corporate Puff Response from CEO John Mackey and the Truth from Nutritionist Cheryl Rounds

"Organic" Mega-merchant Waited Til Only After Suit Was Filed to Remove Offending Body Care Products! Time to Dump Your Shares?
Santa Fe, New Mexico 7/07/2008 03:44 AM GMT (TransWorldNews)

California Suit Against Whole Foods for Carcinogen in Body Care Products

By Ronnie Cummins, Founder, Organic Consumers Association, and Prepared here by Stephen Fox, Managing Editor, Santa Fe Sun News

California Files Lawsuit Against Whole Foods, Avalon, and Others Whose Products Tested Positive for Carcinogenic 1,4-Dioxane in OCA Study

Details are here: http://www.prlog.org/10079593-california-lawsuit-whole-foods-avalon-and-others-with-products-containing-carcinogenic-1-4-dioxane.html

OAKLAND, CA - Reacting in part to a study released by the Organic Consumers Association (OCA) in March of this year, but also based on their own testing, the Attorney General of California has filed a major lawsuit against body care household-cleaning product companies whose products recently tested highest for the carcinogenic contaminant 1,4-Dioxane.

Under California's "Proposition 65" consumer products that contain toxic levels of 1,4 Dioxane must have warning labels stating they may cause cancer. 1,4-Dioxane is typically produced as a byproduct when ingredients are ethoxylated with the petrochemical ethylene oxide, a process which has become standard practice for many cleansing and moisturizing products. The suit, California v. Avalon Natural Products (manufacturer of the Alba brand), also names Whole Foods Market California (manufacturer of the Whole Foods 365 brand), Beaumont Products (manufacturer of the Citrus Magic brand), and Nutribiotic.

It is unclear exactly which products manufactured by the aforementioned companies triggered the lawsuit, but all named companies have sold products that tested close to or in excess of 20 parts per million for 1,4-Dioxane in the OCA study released at the Natural Products Expo in Anaheim, CA in March.Last week OCA sent a letter to the four companies named in the California lawsuit to see if they are planning changes to their labeling or product formulations. Only one company responded. In a letter to the OCA, Beaumont Products wrote, "Upon being notified that there was a problem with our product, we verified that the problem existed, then took immediate action." Beaumont has reformulated their products to remove the problematic ingredient, highlighting their dedication to providing safe products, in contrast to the lack of action taken by the other three companies. http://www.organicconsumers.org/bodycare/beaumont.doc)

The California Attorney General (AG) alleges these companies should have put warning labels on products containing high levels of 1,4-Dioxane, stating that they may cause cancer. The lawsuit states, "Plaintiff alleges that each defendant has known since at least May 29, 2004 that the body washes and gels and liquid dish soaps contain, 1,4-dioxane and that persons using these products are exposed to 1,4-dioxane." Per Proposition 65, fines for mislabeled products are as high as $2,500 per day for each violation.

"These companies need to stop treating the inclusion of cancer causing chemicals in their products as 'business as usual' and reformulate before consumer confidence in the natural products and organics industry is permanently damaged," says consumer activist David Steinman who conducted the OCA study and originally exposed the presence of 1,4-Dioxane in baby bubble bath products in his book Safe Trip to Eden and in a February, 2007 press conference with the Campaign for Safe Cosmetics. The AG's complaint states that California wants "preliminary injunctions, permanent injunctions, or other orders prohibiting the defendant(s) from exposing persons within the State of California to 1,4-dioxane without providing clear and reasonable warnings."

"The OCA's 1,4-dioxane study elevated the issue of fake 'natural' and 'organic' brands that utilize petrochemicals in their formulas in March, and now we are seeing labeling enforcement on a scale never seen before," says OCA National Director Ronnie Cummins. "We used an independent laboratory and found that numerous 'natural' and 'organic' brands tested positive for 1,4-Dioxane, a cancer causing contaminant resulting from the petrochemical ethylene oxide being attached to one or more ingredients."

For immediate release: Interviews with David Steinman or Ronnie Cummins can be arranged by contacting Adam Eidinger at 202-744-2671.

HERE ARE 3 SHORT VIDEOS THAT EXPLAIN ALL OF THIS, FROM TWO OF THE TOP AMERICANS IN THIS EFFORT, RONNIE CUMMINS OF ORGANIC CONSUMERS ASSOCIATION AND MIKE ADAMS, TOP AMERICAN ALTERNATIVE HEALTH JOURNALIST:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t7qe4zfhDLY&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VwLghr2A7Eo

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DjwrhK7FyXY
_______________________________________

Response for Whole Foods CEO and Founder, John Mackey, to SunNews query:

We believe that OCA's allegations are inaccurate. We have conducted our own investigation into the allegations that some of our products contain 1,4-dioxane and do not believe that these products represent a health risk or are in excess of California's Proposition 65 Safe Harbor level for 1,4-dioxane. We are cooperating with the California Attorney General's office to resolve these claims as quickly as possible. For shoppers who are looking for alternatives to the products named by the OCA, we carry numerous USDA organically certified personal care products in addition to other products that meet our own Premium Body Care standards. Our standards have been designed utilizing the most current research and resources to evaluate products in key areas of safety, naturalness, efficacy, environmental impact and labeling.

Regards,
Libba Letton, Media Relations, Whole Foods Market
______________________________________

Analysis of California's Whole Foods Lawsuit by Cheryl Rounds in an exclusive to Santa Fe Sun News, published July 4, 2008

Under California Proposition 65 any substance that contains a known carcinogen must carry a warning label or face prosecution. Most people are under the assumption that body care products are regulated by the FDA or some other federal agency that assures safety and purity. In fact in 1938, the Cosmetic Act made manufacturers of body care responsible for regulating the products they produced. At the time it was assumed the skin was impervious to any of the chemicals they may have used in their beauty formulas.

Today with the introduction and effectiveness of skin patches for drug delivery, we are more aware that chemicals placed on the skin's surface will be absorbed into the body. Even worse every chemical our body is exposed to may not be totally eliminated and may be stored in the body's fat and tissues. The storage of chemicals in the body is called "body burden" and there is not a person alive today that does not have some sort of body burden. Additionally each child born today will inherit some of their mother's body burden and then will add to this burden throughout their lifetime.

There are over 30,000 different chemicals used in body care products today. At least one third are known to be carcinogenic, estrogenic, teratogenic or to cause various problems in human beings. The strategy of the chemical companies who produce these substances is to deny and/or minimize the problems they may cause. One of there key arguments is that these chemicals are in such minute quantities in their products that they couldn't possibly cause harm. This argument negates the fact that these chemicals are in multiple products that are used daily along with multiple other chemicals that could cause synergistic effects.

The chemical named in the lawsuit is 1.4-Dioxane. 1,4-Dioxane is not added directly to body care products but rather it is a by product of the chemical process that turns Sodium (or Ammonium) Laurel Sulfate (SLS) to Sodium (or Ammonium) Laureth Sulfate. Sodium Laurel Sulfate is a very harsh and powerful sudsing agent and degreaser. Sodium Laureth Sulfate is a slightly larger molecule that is little less harsh on the skin. To make the Lauteth version Ethylene Oxide (a petroleum product and known carcinogen) is added to the SLS in a process called ethoxolation.

Chemical companies like to confuse us and claim that one chemical is safer than the other but in truth the safety of neither has been proven. While only certain manufactures were named in the current lawsuit, any body care product or cleanser that has Sodium or Ammonium Laureth Sulfate as an ingredient will also contain 1,4-Dioxane. There are other unintentional ingredients such as nitrosamines and formaldehyde that also show up in body care products. However, aside from these chemicals, we also need to look more closely at the chemicals that manufacturers intentionally put into our personal care.

Many such as phthalates and parabens have been associated with cancers and have been outlawed in Europe. Our manufacturers continue to use these chemicals because they are cheap and effective for the uses they want and manufacturers value profit above safety. They also choose to confuse us, often by noting the natural source of the chemical in parenthesis as (coconut oil) and by noting the words natural or organic somewhere on the label. But be aware that unless accompanied by a third party certification seal such as USDA organic, these words are just marketing terms designed to have us think these products are greener than they really are. This is a marketing technique called "greenwashing."

The bottom line is most commercially sold body care products contain chemicals that can harm our health and that of the planet. There are good products available but we have to educate ourselves as to how to read labels and what to look for. As long as our laws allow manufactures to use questionable chemicals in the products they sell us, buying these products in a store such as Whole Foods or a high end department store, is no assurance of quality. The quickest way to get good products to the market place is to vote with your purse and stop buying products with chemical ingredients.

Whole Foods shame on you! Many people trusted you to do better!

Cheryl Rounds has a BS in Human Nutrition from the University of Massachusetts. After graduating she went on to do independent research on the topics of Whole Foods Nutrition and Holistic Health. She currently writes and lectures on holistic topics in the hopes of inspiring people to make healthier choices for both themselves and the planet. Find out more at her website: www.blissfullyorganic.com

Children on Statins for High Cholesterol?

noreply@blogger.com (Dr. Lanphier) — Tue, 08 Jul 2008 14:19:00 +0000

It appears Big Pharma and the established system of conventional medicine is not satisfied with the millions of adults that are prescribed statin drugs every year, but are now going after the children's market. Despite the known, but often underplayed, hazards of statin use in adults, a leading pediatrician's organization is now recommending cholesterol testing for children as young as 2, and the administration of statin drugs to children as young as 8. The article below includes an astounding statement by a supporter of these plans, admitting that there is little research on the effects of these drugs on children, but that they are considered "generally safe." Well, we've certainly heard those words before!

The obesity epidemic amongst American kids is being used to justify the use of these toxic drugs. Here again we have classic AMA thinking that seeks to throw toxic pharmaceuticals at a health problem instead of addressing the real cause behind the alarming rates of heart disease in this country. Pediatricians, of all people, should be standing up and declaring that our children must be taught to eat real, whole foods instead of the steady diet of pre-packaged junk and fast-food that most consume, along with a lifestyle that encourages lots of physical activity. Instead, they are telling parents to give dangerous drugs to their children, drugs that will only harm them and not help reduce their risk of disease. A quick fix, if you will. Such foolishness as this only robs physicians of the little integrity they have left in the eyes of many these days. It is a travesty that one must question every recommendation given by doctors, as many of them are blinded to the truth by the propaganda put out by Big Pharma and the "researchers" they fund.

Artificial Symptom Relief Does Not Equal Health

Cholesterol Drugs for Kids
July 7, 2008, 12:15 am

The nation's pediatricians are recommending wider cholesterol screening for children and more aggressive use of cholesterol-lowering drugs starting as early as the age of 8 in hopes of preventing adult heart problems.

The new guidelines were to be issued by the American Academy of Pediatrics on Monday. The push to aggressively screen and medicate for high cholesterol in children is certain to create controversy amid a continuing debate about the use of prescription drugs in children as well as the best approaches to ward off heart disease in adults.

But proponents say there is growing evidence that the first signs of heart disease show up in childhood, and with 30 percent of the nation's children overweight or obese, many doctors fear that a rash of early heart attacks and diabetes is on the horizon as these children grow up.

Previously, the academy had said cholesterol drugs should be considered in children older than 10 if they fail to lose weight after a 6- to 12-month effort. The academy estimated that under the current guidelines, 30 percent to 60 percent of children with high cholesterol were being missed. And for some children, cholesterol-lowering drugs, called statins, may be their best hope of lowering their risk of early heart attack, proponents said.

"We are in an epidemic," said Dr. Jatinder Bhatia, a member of the academy's nutrition committee who is a professor and chief of neonatology at the Medical College of Georgia in Augusta. "The risk of giving statins at a lower age is less than the benefit you're going to get out of it."

Dr. Bhatia said that although there was not "a whole lot" of data on pediatric use of cholesterol-lowering drugs, recent research showed that the drugs were generally safe for children.

Surprisingly, the paper published in the medical journal Pediatrics that explains the new guidelines notes that among adolescents, average total cholesterol levels as well as LDL and HDL cholesterol have remained stable, while triglyceride levels have dropped, based on data collected from 1988 to 2000.

It is not clear how many children would be affected by the new guidelines. The recommendations call for cholesterol screening of children and adolescents, starting as early as the age of 2 and no later than the age of 10, if they come from families with a history of high cholesterol or heart attacks before 55 for men and 65 for women.

Screening is also recommended for children when family history is unknown, or if they have other risk factors, like being at or above the 85th percentile for weight, or have diabetes.

If the child's cholesterol level is normal, retesting is suggested in three to five years. Although lifestyle changes are still recommended as the first course of action, drug treatment should be considered for children 8 years and older who have bad cholesterol of 190 milligrams per deciliter and who also have a family history of early heart disease or two additional risk factors, the new recommendations say.

The guidelines give no guidance on how long a child should stay on drug treatment. But they do say the first goal should be to lower bad cholesterol levels to less than 160 milligrams or possibly as low as 110 milligrams in children with a strong family history of heart disease or other risk factors like obesity.

Because statins have been around since only the mid-1980s, there is no evidence to show whether giving statins to a child will lower the risk for heart attack in middle age.

The academy also now recommends giving children low-fat milk after 12 months if a doctor is concerned about future weight problems. Although children need fat for brain development, the group says that because children often consume so much fat, low-fat milk is now appropriate.

http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/07/07/cholesterol-drugs-for-kids/